
What we're likely picking up on is that fact that large districts simply have more potential stuff to write about. If we normalise the map by area we see an entirely different pattern. The map below displays the number of articles per square KM.

We see that most of the large urban conurbations in the UK are covered by a dense layer of articles. Most sparsely populated areas in contrast have a much thinner layer of virtual representation in Wikipedia. There are, however, some notable exceptions. Parts of Cornwall, Somerset and the Isle of Wight all have a denser layer of content than might be expected for such relatively rural parts of the country. One might expect a higher density in the districts surrounding Belfast (in fact almost all of Northern Ireland is characterised by very low levels of content per square KM).
Finally, we can look a the number of articles per person in each district:

Here some more surprising results are visible. All major urban areas have relatively low counts of article per person (with the exception of central London). In contrast, many rural areas (particularly areas containing national parks) have high counts per person.
There are obviously a range of ways to measure the geographies of Wikipedia in the UK. We see that some areas are blanketed by a highly dense layer of virtual content (e.g. central London and many of the UK's other major conurbations). These maps also highlight the fact that some parts of the UK are characterised by a paucity of content irrespective of the ways in which the data are normalised. Northern Ireland in particular stands out in this respect.
I'll attempt to upload similar analyses of other countries in the next few months. In the meantime, however, please offer thoughts on these maps either below or on the cross post at the Floatingsheep blog.
p.s. many thanks to Adham Tamer for his help with the data extraction.
8 comments:
It would be interesting to associate the originating IP of the edits, aka is it local people editing or people from everywhere in the world.
Indeed. I'm currently working with some colleagues on ways to measure the locations of contributors.
Brilliant - well done
Just an idea I'd been thinking about which you may find interesting.
---
Most Wikipedian editors spend their time editting UK/US stuff that is close to where they live.
If there was a tool that told them where the "centre of gravity" of their edits was. Then they might start editting African/Asian subjects??
Can't do it myself, but it looks like you might know someone with the data?
@Victuallers: Funny that you suggest a tool like that because my officemate and I have been plotting just such a thing over the last few weeks. It will involve quite a bit of work, but we are currently putting together a grant proposal to make it happen. I'll post more details about the plan in the next few months. Thanks for the thoughts!
I'm looking forward to similar maps for Ireland!
In terms of geolocation for IP edits-- Laura Hale's work on Wikipedia articles on sport and Australia might be interesting:
http://ozziesport.com/2010/10/expanded-profile-of-australian-en-wp-users/
Jodi,
If you have any county level GIS files (e.g. shapefiles) of Ireland handy, I'd be happy to do the same analysis over there.
Well Ive got more interested in this subject since I took over as chair in this country. Did your grant application happen? I am just completing a project where I have had 40 editors outside the UK writing 1,000 articles and translations about one building. (See "The Wright Challenge"
Post a Comment